Here is my theory: US soccer players are slowly but surely climbing the ranks of the international game, and not just keepers or individual stars, but a generation of players who give Jurgen Klinsmann a very deep bench. The team as a whole has vastly more experience at a higher level than they did just a few years ago. Consider that yesterday's US scorer Clint Dempsey is not even the same player he was last season.
The last time the US played Italy in Italy was almost exactly 10 years ago, when they lost a tight 1-0 match that featured a 19-year old Landon Donovan who clanked a shot off the post. The difference over those 10 years is a squad with vastly more experience perhaps overall quality -- recognizing that the 2002 squad was extremely strong, reaching the quarterfinals of the World Cup a few months after the loss to Italy. Perhaps most surprising about yesterday's victory in Italy is the fact that few would call it the strongest US line-up.
You can certainly point to the large number of players on that excellent 2002 squad who were playing in Europe, but few were regulars and home clubs included NAC Breda and FC Metz. But it is not enough for US players simply to be based in Europe, where the world's best football is played (in professional leagues, mind you). If the US men's national team is to excel it needs players who excel at the game's top level. Period.
I am hypothesizing that yesterday's squad had the most goals scored in all competitions by European based players than any squad that the US has ever put together. I don't actually know if this is the case (I have emailed the excellent guys at Opta to see what they might be able to tell me, but it is an odd request, and perhaps labor intensive) and I am willing to be corrected -- it is a theory after all. However, if US soccer has snuck up on anyone, after yesterday's result, the days of sneaking up are probably over.
How good is Klinsmann? Do I want him when 'Arry goes? I wonder if he's a better international manager than club manager. Charisma/personality over the grind of a wet Wednesday in Wigan, and all that boy/man-management. And a disappointing experience at Bayern.
ReplyDeleteIf I was him I wouldn't take a club job! No vacations.
Now, in Klinsman's defense. If we go back to your article on Klinsman you advocated pragmatism rather than his personal philosophies. One of his strong points was exactly what you said in this post, the need for US players to become serious professionals which means they need to play outside the US where a demanding soccer calendar exists. A great example of where theory and pragmatism come hand in hand. I also think his theory about inculturation of US soccer has great consequences in practical terms as well.
ReplyDeleteI was surprisingly impressed by the US team in '94, and have been happy to see them getting decent results in subsequent World Cups! But I don't see them reaching the levels of some European or Latin American countries until the sport develops more within the US itself... I don't think they can aim for the top if they can only count on players playing overseas...
ReplyDelete