Three of Five
The Economist calls for women's tennis to adopt 3 sets of 5 as a standard match:
In itself, the shorter format demeans women. It gives ammunition to
opponents of equal pay, who argue that women put in fewer hours and
attract less interest than men. And the discrimination is unusually
sexist. While most of the twentieth-century Olympic Games did not
include women’s distance-running events because of similar old-fashioned
prejudice, amends were made in the 1980s. Since then, women have
competed in events as gruelling as the marathon with no ill effects. In
tennis, meanwhile, the influence of the Victorian mindset is still
apparent.
I agree.
No comments:
Post a Comment